"First of all, he didn't approve me. He just said that he doesn't believe in god. Therefore your first explanation is invalid."

Well, lets see what he said:

"I don't belive in any God either"

"Either" in this sentence supports what is been said before (which is ur post)... which means (yah, say it...); he supports U... (I'm glad we could at last talk about something which fits to italki: Grammar! Thx by the way ;-D)


"Second of all you didn't give any reasons either and neither did cleopatra, itlktiv and v. persie. Therefore your second explanation doesn't make sense either."

Richardus just said he didn't belive in God... and thats it. But if u look at the other posts, everybody attached one or two Senteces to their idea.

v.persie: "sure i try to follow him and i have many evidences to prove that he is existed and he saw us"
cleopatra: "So , i try -as much as i can to follow his way.
May Allah Almighty guide us all !!"
itlktiv: ".I think that If we put our arrogance and selfishness beside ,we'll be guided .Otherwise we are astray .because , God didn’t make this life a Di Vinci code ,but it’s easy t understand if we put the thin veils off from our reasons .
Peace Out, " (i specially liked this one)