By creating an account, you agree to our terms of service.
Show previous comments
Please enter between 0 and 2000 characters.
In the yesterday’s lecture, professor Szabo showed a video from the show “Sex and City” to us. This video leaded to a discussion about what certain food more appropriate for women and others for men. In the video, the heroine was a single working woman; she was looking for a mug for coffee before going to work. However, the heroine’s house cleaner, an old lady, offered her some tea leaf, she deemed women should drink more tea instead of drink coffee because tea is healthier; coffee is not a “feminine” beverage. Then some of our classmates added comments on this video, they thought the cause of ideology of “masculine coffee and feminine tea” is that men drink more coffee than women because men always go to work and need coffee to energize them; meanwhile, women usually don’t work outside as much as men do, they tend to stay at home and prepare meals for the family so they don't need coffee as much as men need. This unequal sexual division of labour is contributed by the ideology of “male the breadwinner and female the housewife”. Thus, coffee became a “masculine” beverage to some extent.
In addition, from the reading “‘It's Just Easier for Me to Do It’: Rationalizing the Family Division of Foodwork”, it points out that men are more likely to buy and eat junk food than women; women eat healthily and men eat what they want. Men is associated with “junk” and women is associated with “healthy”. It is women’s responsibility to supervise the health of each member of the family. Therefore, eating healthily is assigned to women. That explains why tea becomes feminine here. And consequently, in my opinion, drinking tea becomes a code of gender role that women “need” to perform.
Please enter between 25 and 8000 characters.