Employers are offering their employees <em>an</em> option to telecommute, that is; to work from home via the Internet, as opposed <em>to</em> working in the office.
Employers <em>offer this option</em> for many reasons, such as eliminating a time-consuming commute in heavy traffic; <em>improving</em> employee morale; <em>decreasing</em> late <em>office-arrivals, and decreasing employee stress.</em> <em>Employers have realized that improving employee morale increases productivity. This benefits both the employees, and the company as a whole. </em>
<em> This</em> option is better for employees, <em>because</em> they do not have to<em> travel, they work in comfort, and</em> they <em>can save the money previously spent on</em> gas or <em>bus fare</em>. <em>It's</em> good for employers <em>also, </em>because they <em>save company overhead costs such as</em>: <em>electricity, water, and other costs</em>. <em>Tele-commuting</em> is better for both employers and employees.
<em>Arce, note the excessive adjectives removed and changes in puncuation. If I were submitting this for grading I would organize the subject matter into: one paragraph dealing with employees only; one paragraph dealing with employers, an Introduction, and a Closing. Consider researching the opposing views in this argument: Why do many employers NOT offer the tele-commute option? </em>