[Loleliness] Loneliness

I think we all are alone. Noone None can understand us entirely, noone none can look at the world like we do, noone none can perceive our feeling like if they were us. And I'm free from the illusion concerning full understanding of people. I don't regard loneliness as punishment or a shortcoming in our life, I call it "a freedom of being ourselves".I don't think that we are empty without another person, so I don't need a man not be alone just because I don't want to be alone, I need him to be alone together in a whole world. It means that he is the only person who knows the real me, who knows me deep inside and so I do too, only we know who we are and nobody else does. Yes, I'm a fuc*ing (you could've avoided this word) dreamer. I still don't see anything ordinary in the blue of the sky, I think life is amazing, I'm alive and I can enjoy the beauty of this world. I don't need a man to show me this, I want we us to share it between each other (I think you want to say: "together")... I'll not (it's either "will not" or " won't") name him "my second half", it would means ("would" because the idea is hypothetical) we are defective in our loneliness and there is millions of other halves who can fill our emptiness, " You're welcome, choose any of them to be complete". I hate this theory or principle, according to which which consists that it's usual to consider ourselves defective without another person, it causes sufferings and people constantly are constantly looking for their "second parts". It's such a convenient speculative theme by means of which it is possible to control everyone and to acquit chaotic partners. This is what people do. I also can do like this, but I won't, I'm absolutely complete in my loneliness. I want our union to be higher than natural human needs, I want it to be our conscious choice, not our neccessity of being together... It's hard to explain, I mean it's such a union which exists contrary to all. It means we are alone together, noone influences on us. It is beyond usual view at the human relationship and sounds too beautifully. And maybe it's too difficult to understand, but I don't need "a second half" so as not to be alone and to be complete with him, I need another complete person for we us to be alone together...There is a big difference.

Loleliness ( That's my personal reflections, just correct my mistakes in the text please)

I think we all are alone. Noone can understand us entirely, noone can look at the world like we do, noone can perceive our feeling like if they were us. And I'm free from illusion concerning full understanding between people. I don't regard loneliness as punishment or a shortcoming in our life, I call it a freedom of being ourselves.I don't think that we are empty without another person, so I don't need a man not be alone, I need him to be alone together in a whole world. It means that he is the only person who knows real me, who knows me deep inside and so I do, only we know who we are and nobody else. Yes, I'm a fuc*ing dreamer. I still don't see anything ordinary in the blue of sky, I think life is amazing, I'm alive and can enjoy beauty of this world. I don't need a man to show me this, I want we to share it between each other... I'll not name him "my second half", it means we are defective in our loneliness and there is million of other halves who can fill our emptiness, " You're welcome, choose any of them to be complete". I hate this theory or principle, according to which it's usual to consider ourselves defective without another person, it causes sufferings and people constantly are looking for their "second parts". It's such a convenient speculative theme by means of which it is possible to control everyone and to acquit chaotic partners. This is what people do. I also can do like this, but I won't, I'm absolutely complete in my loneliness. I want our union to be higher than natural human needs, I want it to be our conscious choice, not our neccessity of being together... It's hard to explain, I mean it's such a union which exists contrary to all. It means we are alone together, noone influence on us. It is beyond usual view at human relationship and sounds too beautifully. And maybe it's too difficult to understand, but I don't need "a second half" not to be alone and to be complete with him, I need another complete person for we to be alone together...There is a big difference.