Looking after of citizens is an inevitable obligation for either a poor or a rich The sole responsibility and obligation of any government, be rich or poor are for its people. Take Singapore as an example. The founding father of modern Singapore [There was another founding father, Sir Stamford Raffles], Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, had successfully transformed Singapore the country from a backward third rate port into to a a first class prosperous country with prosperity to its people outstripping many of its neighboring countries and many of its or counterparts. Getting assistance Initial aid from resourceful rich countries or affording as an joint effort is of a the primary step to build a country. Countries should be independent in long run by Hatching sustainable plans benefiting to benefit its citizens is the only solution. for the countries. Without its citizenry, there will be no country to govern in the first place.  Its people are the country's resource and wealth. are not burden, yet, valuable capital for a country’s prosperity and improvement. Development of Africa’s country is dragged behind because of massive graft and neglect of people’s livelihood. A good look at most of the African countries of today.  The government is enriching itself, or rather those in power to rape and plunder whatever external aid  they may get their hands on.  There is no regard for its people; they are merely looked upon as cattle, waiting to be pillaged.  So how can a nation prosper?  People are always the prime concern for a country. Being a disadvantaged nation is not an sufficient excuse to evade responsibility attending to the citizens. Thus, the existence of a government caters to its people so as to sustain.

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations?

We have always been being taught to give the needy a hand. A little help offered to definitely makes someone’s day. For me it is. Why don’t we go ahead in which having resources or competency to do so? Be more assertive.  I help whenever I have the resource and ability.  Therefore, Thus, I am totally for it.  the statement of “wealthy nations should share their wealth among poorer nations.” [太囉嗦]However, the way of to share and the action of sharing are worth discussing.

A question I would like to raise out is How can a more developed country best assist an unprivileged nation? Or how can the poorer nations sustain with the help by the wealthy nations? should aid and how the recipient country should help itself. This should be discusssed in detail.  Of course, Simply by the rich can simply providing food and shelter will not work. bread and roof to the poor. Clearly, this is like throwing money and resources into a black hole! shallow assistance cannot root problems out comprehensively. Providing food and shelter is an initial step This only works initially and as a short term solution.  A long term solution must be sought.  What critical is the next move going to be taken. Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Showing Teach him how to catch fish, and you feed him he is fed for a lifetime. This should be the way. That what a wealthy nation shares to a poorer nation. Provision of one-off handouts, which I cannot deny its immediate effect, is not a sustainable wealth sharing. Merely providing the fish to the table is not sustainable in the long term.Sustainable sharing is how the poor nations benefit from the wealthy nations in a long-term prospect. Those wealthy should share resources or measures among those poor in eradicating No deep-rooted problems can be eradicated in this way. Provision of Providing free education is one of the basic solutions.  a palpable move can be adopted. Indeed, the wealthy nations should be required to share wealth among the poorer nations.