the writing task written below. hope someone can help correct my works. thank you! Q:In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment , most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job . To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? Recently, a heated discussion has been sparked with regard to whether only primary education should be provided for a majority of students in countries with a low rate of employment and simultaneously it is no use executing secondary education among those who fail to gain a job, which has aroused general public concern. From where I stand, I am opposed to this opinion to an intense degree. Admittedly, there is no denying that primary education might meet the demand of citizens’ daily activities in a country undergoing a higher risk of unemployment. For instance, it is simple calculation in math taught in primary school that could be utilized frequently when people purchase and sell merchandise with each other, which may conduce to their routine business. However, given the long-term development in the country, there is no doubt that such a degree of education may not be able to go far as the benefits of the public and the economy of society should be included. For one thing, low as the rate of employment in the country can be, it is of paramount significance to realize the equality of education. It is commonly acknowledged that there is no right for the opportunity to attain secondary education to be deprived of from each single individual despite the hope for them to receive a job offer, due to the fact that not only does it enhance pupils’ knowledge but also they can benefit their value of life from it. In other words, every student is supposed to own an equal chance to further their studies in secondary school. For another, it is prospective growth in economy of the country that should be associated with the secondary education. For example, in secondary school, students can potentially have access to more educational resources, which would probably bring about their improvement in quality as well as intelligence. As a result, with the advent of intellectuals, an increasing metamorphosis in employment in the country is more likely to take place. In conclusion, in terms of the equality of education and the development of economy in the future, it is worth our attention that secondary education should also be required among pupils in a country confronting the unemployment issue, even though their chance to seek a job is not promising.