tast 1; integrat writing correct my mistakes please
The lecture and the reading are both discussing about space exploration. While the reading states that we must benefit science for space exploration, the lecture refutes this idea, saying that we must benefit science for developing lives because there are many children living in poor situations in USA.
First of all, the reading claims that all the new technology was developed by space exploration, for example dishes and computer. Conversely the lecture argues that we must focus to find the solution to the problems found in our mother earth such as a solution for education.
In addition, the reading argues that we will invest in travel to space by shuttle because it is future tourism. However, the lecture makes another argument that travel to space is very expensive and space will be for super rich people.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that through space exploration, we can find life in other planets but the lecture dismisses this claim. It is alone in this idea which will affect the children because they will be hungry and also the education decreases for that the lecture say we must benefit from science to develop our planet.