Minh Thu
I do not know whether it is correct or not Article 1. Opened Expert Team as the agency of the parent company (F.G.NOTION CO., LTD) to support the factory operation process in Vietnam started on 3/2015 (VIET NAM BYRON HOLDINGS LIMITED). The factory is tentatively set to start on 8/2015, including the members: Article 2. During the supporting period, Expert Team actively proposes the fieldwork plan in Vietnam. The tentative activity plan of Expert Team in Vietnam Article 3. Party B will be responsible to pay the costs incurred related to the expert team in Vietnam (living expenses and healthcare service) in the scope of work supports the implementation of the new factory In the case that the members of expert team perform a self-payment for service providers in Vietnam, Party B is obliged to reimburse these costs to Party A based on legal documents. Article 4. This agreement is valid from the date of establishment. Expert Team is automatically dissolved after completion of initial support for Party B and when factory officially go into operation.
Sep 16, 2015 4:53 AM
Corrections · 2
Hi there, I just want to know whether it correct in grammar or not :) By the way, are you studying Vietnamese ?
October 5, 2015
This looks like legalese which does not always adhere to the conventions of standard English. Other than a missing punctuation mark, I am not certain what this is trying to accomplish so I'm not sure how to respond to your question of whether it is right or not. What exactly are you asking about being right or not?
October 4, 2015
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!