Site Feedback

Resolved questions
''should'' , ''must '' and '' have to ''

What the differences between ''should'' , ''must '' and '' have to '' ?

For learning: English
Base language: English
Category: Other

Share:

0 comments

    Please enter between 2 and 2000 characters.

     

    Answers

    Sort by:

     

    Best Answer - Chosen by Voting



    A key distinction between ‘must’ and ‘have to’ can be found in the negative forms. Whereas ‘You must go’ and ‘You have to go’ can be regarded as broadly the same in terms of meaning, ‘You mustn’t go’ and ‘You don’t have to go’ are quite different, the first indicating that going is prohibited in some way, or even dangerous, while the second implies an absence of obligation or need.

    Another difference between ‘must’ and ‘have to’ in the sense of obligation can be found in the nature of the obligation. It is possible to say ‘I’m sorry. I can’t come to the meeting tomorrow because I have to go to the dentist at 3 o’clock’ but not ‘I can’t come to the meeting tomorrow because I must go the dentist at 3 o’clock’. On the other hand, if you have a raging toothache, you would probably say ‘I really must go to the dentist’, although ‘have to’ could replace ‘must’ in this sentence. A generalized distinction would be that ‘must’ refers to an internal need or obligation while ‘have to’ is used to refer to an external need or obligation. It is probably true to say, however, that ‘must’ can generally be replaced by ‘have to’ but ‘have to’ often cannot be replaced by ‘must’ so in terms of teaching, it is probably a good idea to teach ‘have to’ for obligation because it is nearly always correct whereas ‘must’ is often inappropriate. ‘Must’ and ‘must not’ are useful for official notices and instructions, e.g. ‘You must carry your passport at all times’ and ‘You must not smoke in the toilets’.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2) Should and ought to


    ‘Should’ and ‘ought to’ are basically the same, although ‘should’ is much more widely used than ‘ought to’. The negative and interrogative forms of ‘ought to’ are becoming increasingly rare. Both ‘should’ and ‘ought to’ are used to talk about obligation and duty and to give advice. One way of getting the meaning of ‘should’ across to learners is to contrast its meaning with that of ‘must’ and ‘have to’ as the degree of obligation is considerably less, e.g. ‘I have to go to the doctor’ as compared to ‘I should go to the doctor’.

    "Must" and "have to" are the same thing. I cannot think of any time you could use one and not the other. They both mean that an action is required, necessary, certain.

    "Should" is a little softer. It means that the action is correct, advisable, or proper, but not as certain

    Submit your answer


    Please enter between 2 and 2000 characters.

    If you copy this answer from another italki answer page, please state the URL of where you got your answer from.