Site Feedback

Resolved questions
Using short-form adjectives vs. adjectives in the instrumental case after быть / стать

 

Hey guys, I have a few questions about something that's been bothering me for awhile.

For describing things with быть / стать (and становиться), I know that, generally, they take nouns and adjectives in the instrumental case. However, almost equally common is the use of the short-form adjective:

Это будет полезным - This will be helpful/useful
Это будет полезно - This will be helpful/useful

Она была счастливой - She was happy
Она была счастлива - She was happy

Он стал ленивым - He got lazy
Он стал ленив - He got lazy

At the moment, I see both forms as describing the same thing. Are these two forms interchangeable? Always? In some instances? Does it have to do with a specific state vs. a more general, permanent feature of something or someone?

Thank you very much!

For learning: Russian
Base language: English
Category: Language

Share:

0 comments

    Please enter between 2 and 2000 characters.

     

    Answers

    Sort by:

     

    Best Answer - Chosen by the Asker
    "Ленив" answers the question "каков".
    "Ленивый" answers the question "какой".

    "Каков" questions the quality of something/one. And the respective forms give us information about the quality of something. for example:

    красен дом = the house is of the red color (or beautiful for red is a synonym of beauty in russian).
    высок дом=the house is a tall one.

    "Какой" questions either quality or an attribute of something. In other words какой is more about identifying an object by some parameter. Sometimes it can be used instead of каков, but it doesn't carry the equal emphasis on the _quality_ of a described object, more inclining just to specify the object more precisely.

    красный дом = a red house.
    высокий дом= a tall house.

    Хороша погода= the weather is Great now!
    Хорошая погода=a good weather.

    easy :).

    ps. regading "голубо": "а голубо сегодня небо!" - sounds fine, though a bit old stylish. but it's something i could say when i am walking taking pictures. Прозрачна вода в реке. And so on.
    I don't see any difference in meaning between these two forms. :)
    But I prefer the short one.

    Небо было серо, город был молчалив.
    Небо было ясно, город был полон звуков.

    But Небо было голубым.
    I'm not sure why, but I would never say Небо было голубо. It sounds strange to me.
    So I think It depends on the adjective.

    Basically, the short-form adjectives imply the current condition, while the long adjectives -- the quality in general. For example:

    Я болен -- I’m sick (eg I’ve got a cold)
    Я больной -- I'm unhealthy

    But very often they are interchangable, so it depends on the particular adjective. Он стал ленивым / Он стал ленив. -- the same. Usually, the short adjectives are more common in formal writing.

    With 'это' you should use the short form: Это будет полезно; Это будет хорошо etc.

    Submit your answer


    Please enter between 2 and 2000 characters.

    If you copy this answer from another italki answer page, please state the URL of where you got your answer from.