The second one is timeless. It could be talking about the past, present, or future, depending on context. It could even be interpreted as a request: "Would you mind driving past her house every day?" #1 and #3 are very close. The only difference I can see is that #1 is an inquiry about habitual behavior (Was it your habit to do this?), whereas #3 is a simple question about the facts (Did you do this or not?). So, the questions are the same but the tone is different.

It's hard to imagine that I can't drive. I can only ride a bike or a battery car. , that's funny.

The sentences you've provided are all variations of the same basic idea but differ slightly in terms of tense and phrasing. Let's break down the differences: Did you use to drive past her house every day? This sentence is in the past tense and uses the structure "use to" to talk about a habitual action in the past. It suggests that at some point in the past, you had the habit of driving past her house every day. This phrasing is common when discussing past routines or habits. Would you drive past her house every day? This sentence is in the conditional tense. It's asking about a hypothetical scenario: if conditions were such that you needed to drive past her house every day, would you do it? It doesn't necessarily imply that you actually did drive past her house every day in the past. Did you drive past her house every day? This sentence is in the simple past tense. It directly asks if you had the specific habit of driving past her house every day in the past. It doesn't suggest any hypothetical or conditional scenario; it's asking about a concrete action that may or may not have happened. The differences between these sentences lie in their tense (past, conditional, simple past) and the nuances they convey. The first sentence implies a habitual action in the past, the second sentence presents a hypothetical scenario, and the third sentence directly asks about a specific past action.