Recherche parmi différents professeurs en Anglais…
Alexander
Is it correct that in “I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in 5 years” we don't need the second “would” when talking about the future relative to “be sure”?
2 août 2026 04:40
Réponses · 12
2
Yes, that's correct.
After expressions such as "I wouldn't be sure", "I don't think", or "I doubt", we often use the past tense to refer to a future situation from the speaker's point of view.
So:
"I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in five years."
is perfectly natural.
You could also say:
"I wouldn't be sure that it would be profitable in five years."
if you want to emphasise the future outcome itself, but the second "would" is optional rather than required.
In other words, the first version is completely grammatical and is probably the more natural choice in everyday English.
2 août 2026 17:04
1
I agree with Gareth Todd.
2 août 2026 17:33
1
Your phrase is okay but native speakers might say "I'm not sure that it will be profitable in 5 years."
That's right, no 2nd would needed.
2 août 2026 08:19
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !
Alexander
Compétences linguistiques
Anglais, Ukrainien
Langue étudiée
Anglais
Articles qui pourraient te plaire

How to Work Effectively with International Teams
10 j'aime · 2 Commentaires

Why Do People Still Ask You to Repeat Yourself?
21 j'aime · 11 Commentaires

Why Your English Textbooks Didn’t Prepare You for Fast-Paced Meetings
18 j'aime · 8 Commentaires
Plus d'articles
