Recherche parmi différents professeurs en Anglais…
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"? “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
11 juil. 2021 15:57
Réponses · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense. you can say, “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment. which means the same thing but in the present. .
11 juillet 2021
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
11 juillet 2021
1
This is a good question. Asad''s example is correct. The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently. You could say it in 2 ways: Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present. Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past. Either one makes sense. Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
11 juillet 2021
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense. ReadS is a present tense form.
11 juillet 2021
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
13 juillet 2021
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !

Ne manquez pas cette occasion d'apprendre une langue depuis chez vous. Découvrez notre sélection de professeurs de langues expérimentés et inscrivez-vous dès maintenant à votre premier cours !