Recherche parmi différents professeurs en Anglais…
Ryota
I've learned that after subordinate conjunctions a subject can be omitted when the subject matches the one in the main clause.
I recognize “than” as a subordinate conjunction, but in the subordinate clause in the sentence below it is ‘land and water’ that is omitted. Not ‘they’. Why is that possible?
“Plant-based meats have been gaining popularity. One U.S. company is using mushroom root to make its
products. They use less land and water than is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 déc. 2023 13:11
Réponses · 4
The subjects do not match. Also, "than" is used as a preposition in your sentence, not a conjunction. "Than" is used to introduce the second element in a comparison. The word "is" superfluous, plays no role, and you can omit it: "less land and water than needed". The subordinate clause has no subject and no verb.
17 décembre 2023
You've got the right idea. To replace all the words that have been omitted for the sake of brevity would make the sentence repetitive and overly wordy:
They use less land and water than the amount of land and water that is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 décembre 2023
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !
Ryota
Compétences linguistiques
Anglais, Japonais
Langue étudiée
Anglais
Articles qui pourraient te plaire

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
3 j'aime · 0 Commentaires

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
2 j'aime · 1 Commentaires

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 j'aime · 17 Commentaires
Plus d'articles
