“The progress of a nation can be no swifter than progress in education”, Roosevelt. This saying aptly draws light to the importance of education for a nation’s development, as no nation can compete in this highly competitive world without educating its population. And, this can only be possible if a country provides purposive education, viz, highly researched, goal-oriented education that fulfils the needs of contemporary society. It is evident that many countries, including Pakistan, have been unable to catch up with the developed nations in any arena despite investing in education and having millions of graduate students. The chief reason is, that such nations do not follow purposive education. Now the main question is how to design purposive education? A nation’s educational structure can be redesigned but its content may not be beneficial to others as every country has its own history, values and goals. To develop purposive education, one would need to take into account the historical background, needs, deficiencies, and social inhibiting factors. Without having a goal-oriented and interactive education, there is no meaning in purposive education. However, If it is implemented in an appropriate way, it can create wonders for a nation. It can increase social and political integration, and provide efficient future leadership, innovation, economic stability and sustainable growth. All of these are contingent on purposive education. Therefore, it is fair to say that purposive education is imperative for a nation and its social, economic, political stability, and progress.

The word "purposive" is a rare adjectival form of purpose. It is never heard in spoken English. I have never seen it in written English either, even academic written English. This affects the intelligibility of your argument, because "purposive" is not understood, and therefore your argument is not understood. If it is truly a form of the word "purpose" that you are intending, you should use "purposeful" instead, which is widely used and understood. If that is not your argument, perhaps look for a different word. Overall, your argument is well-constructed and eloquent. Your writing is somewhat vague; you could benefit from giving more specific examples. The criticisms that I am making are "nit-picky," which is to say that they are particular, and many of your mistakes might be made by a native speaker. In terms of proper citation: - "... swifter than our progress in education" (Roosevelt). OR - "As Roosevelt said, [quote]" OR - "According to former US President Roosevelt, [quote]" (Side note: As far as I know, this quote was actually said by US President John F. Kennedy.) Fulfils is the correct spelling in British English, but seeing as you referenced a US president, I thought you might be interested to know that it is spelled "fulfills" in the US. "As" cannot begin that particular sentence. I would suggest removing it and starting the sentence with "no." (Your other option would be to join the sentences, with a comma inserted before "as." However, in this situation, I don't think their content is related enough.) "Also, THIS can only be possible if a nation or a country pursues a purposive education." "...including Pakistan, have been unable to catch UP TO developed nations in any AREA" "However, If" --> "However, if" (not capitalized) "... and provide efficient future leadership, innovation, economic stability, and sustainable growth, all OF WHICH are contingent on purposive education." *** "BEGINS social, economic, and political stability..."