I think that you are definitely on the right track, but might I suggest these few changes: (*I'm a little confused by this first sentence) Nowadays, ethnology can hardly be made to be simple folklore traditions that are simply believed to be phenomenas that independently live in the villages as a part of the everyday life of the local inhabitants (<-I think that's a run-on sentence, but I'm still trying to figure out how to properly write it). The American anthropologist, John Forrest, pointed out the future of academic study of folklore and the fact of whether or not folkloristics as a discipline can survive. As a result, it is quite clear, even at the beginning of the 21st century, that we are not very surprised by this.Where is the border between what we can call as construction (invented tradition to a larger or smaller extent) and what indisputably belonged to folk culture and continues in everyday culture?