Trouvez des professeurs en Anglais
Lily
I haven't seen him in years. She said she hadn't seen him in years.
Is this correct, or do I need to change "in years" to something else? Thanks!
5 déc. 2014 15:28
Réponses · 5
2
Both are fine. You could say, "I haven't seen him FOR years," as well.
If you want to go to the future... then you need 'for.' ('in' doesn't work). I won't/mightn't/shan't see him for years. However, word it differently and 'in' works: I'll see him in a few years.
But for the present and past: I haven't seen him in/for years, I hadn't seen him in/for years.
Also, I didn't see him for years. I think it sounds odd to use 'in' here. With 'didn't' - but perhaps that's just me!
5 décembre 2014
1
I'm guessing that you're asking about changing a sentence from direct to indirect speech. What you have written is correct. The phrase 'in years' doesn't change
when you put the sentence into indirect speech.
5 décembre 2014
1
Both are correct.
5 décembre 2014
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !
Lily
Compétences linguistiques
Arabe, Anglais, Français
Langue étudiée
Anglais, Français
Articles qui pourraient te plaire

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
7 j'aime · 2 Commentaires

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
15 j'aime · 3 Commentaires

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 j'aime · 7 Commentaires
Plus d'articles