Hi, I do not understand your question that much. But usually, in chinese, if we say: 切碎干酪，means using a knife to cut cheese into slashings. 磨碎干酪，means squashing the cheese. But 擦伤干酪， it is not a correct use.

French râper'to scratch, to grate [cheese]' is cognate to Spanish raspar 'to scrape I'll say that ：法语中的 râper（切碎，磨碎）和西班牙的raspar（刮擦）同源。 but râper “擦伤、磨碎【干酪】” 这个法语词和 raspar “刮坏” 这个西语词是同源词 is also ok。 there is no fixed experssion 。

As long as no confusion arises, foreign words can be cited as if they were Chinese words. E.g. 胡安发现preoccupation这个词在中文里没有很好的翻译。 （或）胡安发现preoccupation在中文里没有很好的翻译。 (Juan found that (the word) "preoccupation" doesn't have a good translation in Chinese.) E.g. 在西班牙语中，gustar的用法与tomar, correr等动词相比显得比较特别。 (In Spanish, the usage of "gustar" seems quite peculiar in comparison to that of the verbs "tomar", "correr", etc.) Caveat: Be careful of the use of punctuation marks when citing foreign words in a Chinese context. E.g. 中文里没有单词能翻译英文单词fundamentalist. (The period after "fundamentalist" is in the English style, not in the Chinese style.) P.S.: It is deprecated to directly cite foreign words in Chinese unless it is for linguistic pedagogic purposes.

Usually we will translate it into Chinese to express the meaning