Trouvez des professeurs en Anglais
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
29 avr. 2017 09:35
Réponses · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
29 avril 2017
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
29 avril 2017
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !
Danyel
Compétences linguistiques
Biélorusse, Anglais, Français, Polonais, Russe, Ukrainien
Langue étudiée
Anglais, Polonais
Articles qui pourraient te plaire

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 j'aime · 2 Commentaires

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 j'aime · 3 Commentaires

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 j'aime · 7 Commentaires
Plus d'articles