Recherche parmi différents professeurs en Anglais…
Ksenia
Get + Past Participle vs Passive Voice What is the difference between the usage of the pattern "get + a past participle" and a passive voice? For example, Joe got arrested for drunk driving last week. = Joe was arrested for drunk driving last week. He never got married.= He was not married. Is the pattern 'get + a past participle' more informal? Or are there other nuances? Thank you for your time and help :)
20 août 2017 15:33
Réponses · 3
3
Yes, the Get + Past Participle is a more informal version of the be-passive. Here are some theoretical differences (taken from CGEL, the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language): It is used with dynamic verbs (e.g. The village got surrounded (dynamic) versus The village was surrounded (static). If the individual has some responsibility for what happens, get tends to be used (compare He was arrested (he was innocent) and He got arrested (he was guilty)). Compare also "He got himself arrested." Get tends to be used when something happens that is unfortunate or beneficial to the subject (compare He got hurt/His watch got broken and He got promoted). We say, "The door was opened by a small child." We would not say, "The door got opened," since this is of no benefit to the door.
20 août 2017
2
I agree with Ben on both counts: 1. The 'get' + pp is more informal than the passive. 2. The 'get' + pp may suggest that the person was more actively involved in the process.
20 août 2017
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !

Ne manquez pas cette occasion d'apprendre une langue depuis chez vous. Découvrez notre sélection de professeurs de langues expérimentés et inscrivez-vous dès maintenant à votre premier cours !