Hello everyone,
Could anybody explain why both "which" and "that" can be used as relative pronouns in defining relative clauses, whereas "that" cannot be used in non-defining relative clauses—even though both pronouns have the same meaning and serve the same function?
Recherche parmi différents professeurs en Anglais…
Réponses · 1
0
Grammatically “that” is used to single something out from a group so it sounds natural in defining relative clauses. It sounds less natural in non- defining relative clauses when non-essential information is introduced, however I would imagine there are a huge amount of native English speakers who get this wrong in everyday speech.
My advice is not to worry too much about formality or “why” and focus on learning a trick/ rule you can always remember.
For example: use “that” for essential information and “which” for extra information.
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !
Ne manquez pas cette occasion d'apprendre une langue depuis chez vous. Découvrez notre sélection de professeurs de langues expérimentés et inscrivez-vous dès maintenant à votre premier cours !
Commencez à apprendre aujourd'hui
