ㅤㅤㅤ
Are these natural? -I sneaked eating his snacks. -I secretly ate his snacks. Meaning: I ate his snacks without wanting him to know and now he found out someone ate it, but he doesn't know who.
1 août 2023 02:26
Réponses · 6
1
The second one sounds fine. The meaning of the first one is unclear.
1 août 2023
I sneaked into the kitchen and ate his snacks.
1 août 2023
You can say: I snuck some of his snacks. I sneakily took his snacks. ‘Secretly’ is ok, but it’s a little grandiose for something as simple as taking someone’s snacks. It’s not necessary or natural to use ‘eating’ here because the important fact is that you took them. (‘Eating’ is understood without saying it) In my first sentence, ‘snuck’ would be understood to mean ‘took sneakily’
1 août 2023
Both are correct but the first is less natural. In #1, "eating his snacks" is a noun clause that is the direct object of the verb "sneaked". This is correct usage. One of the recognized meanings of the verb "to sneak" is "to convey in a stealthy way". For example, you can say "I sneaked a look at the performance" (in which "a look" is the thing conveyed) "I sneaked dancing the cha-cha into my schedule for the evening". (in which "dancing the cha-cha" is the thing that is conveyed into my schedule. So #1 is a correct and meaningful sentence, but many people will have trouble understanding it. One problem with the sentence is that it puts the most essential fact into a noun, "eating". It is better to put the force of your sentence into a verb than a noun: "I sneakily ate his snacks".
1 août 2023
The second one is correct and natural. The first one is definitely a bit unclear and not a natural way of expression.
1 août 2023
Afficher plus
Vous n'avez pas encore trouvé vos réponses ?
Écrivez vos questions et profitez de l'aide des locuteurs natifs !