But "how" can not help to elicit such a response as "the third" for "Jefferson was the third president", where English has no really satisfactory way of phrasing the question. (original) Is this sentence grammatically correct? I guess: If we question about " the third" for " Jefferson was the third president" , there is no way to use the word "how" to form the interrogative sentence to question about "the third" here, or rather, "how" can not help to elicit such a response as "the third" for "Jefferson was the 3rd president". Is that right?

Could you please tell me if these sentences sound natural in everyday spoken English? Thank you! 😊 - The sole student with low grades was dealing with a lot of family issues. - She's the stepmom of the student with the low grades. - Julia is the girl with red hair, and Lucy is the one with blue hair. - Michael is the guy with the mustache, while Gary is the one in the sleeveless shirt. - Look at this photo. My sister is the one playing the piano. - We were the team in green shirts. It was a close soccer match. - Juanes is a famous Colombian musician with songs that have been successful in many countries. - Some people don’t just eat anything, while others eat whatever is in front of them. - Some kids don't want anything for Christmas; they want expensive gifts and toys. - He's such a picky eater; I'm sure he won't be happy with anything you cook.

Book a trial lesson with me ☺️🇫🇷

Hello! I wonder how often the phrase "to be a sucker for something" (to like something so much that you cannot refuse it or judge its real value) is used? Thank you)

Are you ready to unlock your learning potential?

i need help with my academic writing，i'M a medical student and now ready to finish my essay, but I NEED some improvement with the language. I hope you would have the experience of writing essays and published in a journal especially medical related.

This sentence (the original) is rather complex to me , I would like to offer the teachers with English their native language my way to understand it. The original: To that world of assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations , our last best hope in an age where the instruments of the war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support:… My way to understand the original: ① . To that world of assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations , our last best hope, in an age where the instruments of the war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, is still in the United Nations. We renew our pledge of support:… to that world of assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations. ② . We renew our pledge of support:… to that world of assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations ,which (= the United Nations) is our last best hope in an age where the instruments of the war have far outpaced the instruments of peace. Question: Are both of my guesses grammatically correct? and having the same meaning as the original?

Is it correct and does it sound natural? sorry, my tooth was removed, I can’t go out anywhere 🥹because of pain