Beshoy
I lived in London for 7 years. I'd been living in London for 7 years. Are they both correct? If yes what is the difference between them both ( these two sentences) in meaning ? Thanks in advance.
2021年4月8日 11:48
回答 · 10
2
It's about context. In the first sentence you are simply stating a fact about what happened to you in the past. The second sentence would be used in relation to some other event or moment in the past, so saying it to this way sounds a bit strange. But, if you "I had been living in London for 7 years, when I met my future wife". Then, the second sentence make sense, because you would be talking about the period of time before you met your wife to be, as well as the fact of meeting her.
2021年4月8日
1
They are both correct but have slightly different uses. I lived in London for 7 years - past simple, used to talk about a completed action in the last I had been living in London for 7 years - past perfect continous used to talk about how long an action continued in the past before another action in the past So it might be something like: I had been living in London for 7 years before I met my partner. Or I had been living in London for 7 years before I started to feel homesick.
2021年4月8日
1
Live means the past =you don't live there anymore. I have been living = you still live there. There is one more sentence..I have lived, which means that it is something steady, longer..you would use it with 15 or 20 years for example.
2021年4月8日
*lived
2021年4月8日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!
Beshoy
語学スキル
アラビア語, アラビア語 (エジプト), アラビア語 (現代標準), 英語, フランス語, ドイツ語, イタリア語, ポルトガル語, ロシア語
言語学習
アラビア語, 英語, フランス語, ドイツ語, イタリア語, ポルトガル語, ロシア語