多彩な 英語 講師陣から検索…
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"? “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
2021年7月11日 15:57
回答 · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense. you can say, “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment. which means the same thing but in the present. .
2021年7月11日
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
2021年7月11日
1
This is a good question. Asad''s example is correct. The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently. You could say it in 2 ways: Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present. Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past. Either one makes sense. Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
2021年7月11日
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense. ReadS is a present tense form.
2021年7月11日
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
2021年7月13日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!

ご自宅で快適に語学を学べるチャンスをお見逃しなく。経験豊富な語学講師陣の中からお選びいただき、今すぐ最初のレッスンにお申し込みください!