timmy1503
Why do you use eres and not es in this example. tu no eres una persona negativa. you are not a negative person. being a negative person a permanant characteristic of the person. it describes their personality. I would therefore assume it was ser and not estar. Thank you
2014年10月29日 07:13
回答 · 7
2
Like Amparo said. Now, it's perhaps interesting to note that you would be perfectly correct to use "es" if you were speaking Portuguese, French, or Latin. Example in European Portuguese "(Tu) no és uma pessoa negativa." Latin: "(Tu) non es persona negativa" or, more typically "Persona negativa non es."
2014年10月29日
1
Yes, you are right! Tú no eres una persona negativa. "Eres" is verb "ser" for second person singular. Verbo SER: yo soy, tú eres, él es, nosotros somos, vosotros sois, ellos son.
2014年10月29日
1
Traditionally is explained the difference between SER (defines a QUALITY, ATTRIBUTE) and ESTAR (defines a STATUS). "Timmy es alegre" (generally, normally) or "Timmy está alegre" (at this point in time). Even so you should keep in mind that the attributes of the people or things that define SER expresses and defines CHARACTERISTICS, regardless of whether they are permanent or temporary. Thereby, "The child is small (though certainly he's going to grow up).
2014年10月29日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!