''above-mentioned'' and ''aforementioned'': difference & position of the main subject (grammar) 1) I've read that ''aforementioned'' is archaic, is it? how does the grammar rule work? eg ...it's not

多彩な英語講師陣から検索…

Victoria Lopez

''above-mentioned'' and ''aforementioned'': difference & position of the main subject (grammar) 1) I've read that ''aforementioned'' is archaic, is it? how does the grammar rule work? eg ...it's not like the aforementioned phrases. ...it's not like the phrases aforementioned. 2) Which form is the correct? abovementioned above-mentioned above mentioned

2016年8月31日 18:44

回答 · 3

Hi Victoria, Aforementioned is not really archaic but it is highly formal. "Abovementioned" or "above-mentioned" are correct, although I have seen "above mentioned" used on occasion. I find that "previously mentioned" is less clumsy and may not be so confusing if the words appear on the opposite page of a book, rather than literally above the text.

2016年8月31日

まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか？

質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう！