英語 の講師を検索する
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
2017年4月29日 09:35
回答 · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
2017年4月29日
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
2017年4月29日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!
Danyel
語学スキル
ベラルーシ語, 英語, フランス語, ポーランド語, ロシア語, ウクライナ語
言語学習
英語, ポーランド語
こんな記事もいかがでしょう

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 いいね · 2 コメント

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 いいね · 3 コメント

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 いいね · 7 コメント
他の記事