多彩な 英語 講師陣から検索…
Andrés
Is "would" more than an auxiliare verb?
Look at this sentence:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we would otherwise"
Why "would" doesn't need here of any complementary verb? Can "would" work alone?
Can I change "would" for "could" on this example?
2019年7月23日 15:32
回答 · 4
Thank you Chris, your advice always is really good
2019年7月23日
Would takes a verb object. Here "we would " is an elliptical version of "we would spend."
The statement is an implicit type 2 conditional. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we WOULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
Here, the modal could can replace would with no significant change in meaning. Like would, could takes a verb object. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we COULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
2019年7月23日
Thank you Kyler Shea, very good answer, it's clear!
2019年7月23日
"Would" is a verb. It doesn't need a complimentary verb. It works alone. You can change "would" for "could" but the meaning is a little different. Also, switching "otherwise" and "would" sounds more natural. You can say:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise would"
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise could"
Both are good sentences
2019年7月23日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!
Andrés
語学スキル
英語, フランス語, ポルトガル語, スペイン語
言語学習
英語, フランス語, ポルトガル語
こんな記事もいかがでしょう

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 いいね · 13 コメント

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 いいね · 12 コメント

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 いいね · 6 コメント
他の記事
