Beshoy
I lived in London for 7 years. I'd been living in London for 7 years. Are they both correct? If yes what is the difference between them both ( these two sentences) in meaning ? Thanks in advance.
2021년 4월 8일 오전 11:48
답변 · 10
2
It's about context. In the first sentence you are simply stating a fact about what happened to you in the past. The second sentence would be used in relation to some other event or moment in the past, so saying it to this way sounds a bit strange. But, if you "I had been living in London for 7 years, when I met my future wife". Then, the second sentence make sense, because you would be talking about the period of time before you met your wife to be, as well as the fact of meeting her.
2021년 4월 8일
1
They are both correct but have slightly different uses. I lived in London for 7 years - past simple, used to talk about a completed action in the last I had been living in London for 7 years - past perfect continous used to talk about how long an action continued in the past before another action in the past So it might be something like: I had been living in London for 7 years before I met my partner. Or I had been living in London for 7 years before I started to feel homesick.
2021년 4월 8일
1
Live means the past =you don't live there anymore. I have been living = you still live there. There is one more sentence..I have lived, which means that it is something steady, longer..you would use it with 15 or 20 years for example.
2021년 4월 8일
*lived
2021년 4월 8일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
Beshoy
언어 구사 능력
아랍어, 아랍어(이집트), 아랍어(현대 표준어), 영어, 프랑스어, 독일어, 이탈리아어, 포르투갈어, 러시아어
학습 언어
아랍어, 영어, 프랑스어, 독일어, 이탈리아어, 포르투갈어, 러시아어