I should stress that I meant to say "a restrictive relative clause where 'that' represents the object (not the subject) of the relative clause)."
2018년 5월 5일
0
1
1
Yes, it’s fine to omit “that” at the beginning of a restrictive relative clause. Personally, I would prefer to drop “that” in your example, since there’s no risk of ambiguity and “that” contributes nothing whatsoever to the meaning.