Search from various 영어 teachers...
Caxio
Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. 1a. It is four years since he was in New York. 1b. He was in New York four years ago. 1c. He has not been in New York for four years. Question: Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 2a. It is ten hours since I had anything to eat. 2b. I last had anything to eat ten hours ago. 2c. I have not been having anything to eat for ten hours. 2d. I have not had anything to eat for ten hours. Question: Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning?
2026년 5월 13일 오전 6:14
답변 · 3
1
#1. All are grammatical but they all have different meanings: a) He left NY four years ago. "It has been" would be better than "It is", but the meaning is the same. b) This is a statement about one moment in time. It says nothing about what happened before or after that time (four years ago). c) This is not the same as (a) because (c) leaves open the possibility that he may never have been in NY.
2026년 5월 15일 오후 9:49
초대받은 사람
All of these are either grammatical or very close to grammatical, but they are not all equally natural, and some do not mean exactly the same thing. All three usually imply that his last visit to New York was four years ago. But there’s a subtle nuance: * 1a / 1b focus on the time of the visit. * 1c focuses on the period of absence. So the meaning is effectively the same in normal conversation. * 2a = 2b = 2d All mean: * You have eaten nothing during the last ten hours. * 2c tries to express the same idea but sounds awkward and unnatural. It is not grammatically correct.
2026년 5월 13일 오전 7:33
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!

집에서 편안하게 언어를 배울 수 있는 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 경험 많은 강사진을 살펴보고 지금 바로 첫 수업을 신청하세요!