Ryota
Is the clause “without whose … life” an adjectival phrase that modify “other animals”? “Are other animals disappearing that at first do not seem to be essential yet without whose activity we could not conceive life?”
2024년 3월 27일 오전 6:30
답변 · 3
2
This sentence could be written as "Are other animals that do not seem essential and that without whose activity we could not conceive life disappearing?" but this violates English end-weight principles. If you want more information, do a net search for "Definition and Examples of End Weight in Grammar." The article on the thoughtco dot com web site is meant for a general audience.
2024년 3월 27일
초대받은 사람
Salaam Ryota! Yes, "whose" refers to the "animals".
2024년 3월 27일
It is a badly placed adjective phrase. To make your sentences clear, place adjectival phrases next to the words they are intended to modify: “Are animals, without whose activity life could not be conceived, disappearing?”
2024년 3월 27일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!