Is the clause “without whose … life” an adjectival phrase that modify “other animals”?
“Are other animals disappearing that at first do not seem to be essential yet without whose activity we could not conceive life?”
This sentence could be written as "Are other animals that do not seem essential and that without whose activity we could not conceive life disappearing?" but this violates English end-weight principles. If you want more information, do a net search for "Definition and Examples of End Weight in Grammar." The article on the thoughtco dot com web site is meant for a general audience.
2024년 3월 27일
0
2
초대받은 사람
0
Salaam Ryota!
Yes, "whose" refers to the "animals".
2024년 3월 27일
0
0
0
It is a badly placed adjective phrase. To make your sentences clear, place adjectival phrases next to the words they are intended to modify:
“Are animals, without whose activity life could not be conceived, disappearing?”