The usage as 'user(s)', is it correct? Often see this usage, for example: "The user(s) and the customer(s) are often not the same person(s)." (IEEE Std 830-1998) It seems, I think, this usage such

Search from various 영어 teachers...

flyingrobot

The usage as 'user(s)', is it correct? Often see this usage, for example: "The user(s) and the customer(s) are often not the same person(s)." (IEEE Std 830-1998) It seems, I think, this usage such as 'user(s)' has a logic error: confused a set (collection) and its members. My reason is that a set can have a 0, 1, ..., n of members, so we should always use the plural when we talking about the set, isn't it?

2011년 12월 17일 오전 9:15

답변 · 6

I'm not quite sure what you are talking about. a set = singular noun, so use the singular. a user and a customer = two people, so use plural.

2011년 12월 17일

In many situations, the writer of statements like these does not know how many people he or she is discussing. There might be one user or customer, but there might be more. In these situations, there is a convention to use "(s)" at the end of appropriate words in the sentence in order to convey both a singular and plural situation. Your sentence is actually a way to write two sentences as one sentence. Here are the two sentences: The user and customer are often not the same person. The users and customers are often not the same persons (or people). The use of three (s)'s conveys that the writer wrote both of the above sentences, even though he did not.

2011년 12월 17일

아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?

질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!