Search from various 영어 teachers...
Gavin
Differences between 'archaic' and 'obsolete'
2012년 7월 28일 오전 7:29
답변 · 2
2
"Archaic" stems from the same root as "archaeology" -- old stuff. An "archaic" word or item would be something out of chronology -- it belongs in the past, but there may not be any replacement for it. "Obsolete" means replaced. An obsolete entity is something that is old AND has a replacement. "Automobile" is both archaic and obsolete. It sounds old and was only used during the earlier part of the 20th century, and it has a replacement -- "car." The CD-player is obsolete -- it has been replaced by iPods and iPhones -- but it's still relatively new; not yet ancient enough to be considered "archaic" and is only called so in a mocking way. Aztec ruins are archaic -- belonging to the ancient past. They are not obsolete, however, as we still use them to learn about our history.
2012년 7월 28일
1
As far as I remember, archaic means something that was common in the past, you can find it in books published long ago. Some men may be able to use it. Obsolete is more strong than archaic, it means that this word (for example) no longer used. Though to be honest, they are almost identical.
2012년 7월 28일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!

집에서 편안하게 언어를 배울 수 있는 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 경험 많은 강사진을 살펴보고 지금 바로 첫 수업을 신청하세요!