Search from various 영어 teachers...
Candice
Why not use "is" instead of "be" in the following sentence?
We must ensure that development of the economy is based on science and technology and that development of science and technology be(why not use"is" here?) based on the needs of economy.
2016년 4월 29일 오전 7:30
답변 · 4
1
The 'be' is a subjunctive, triggered by the phrase 'we must ensure that...' . We don't use the subjunctive as much as other languages, but this is a case where we do use it.
Could you replace the 'be' with a simple 'is'? Yes, you could. You don't have to use a subjunctive here.
2016년 4월 29일
1
In this case, you can choose either "is" or "be", but you should be consistent. There is only one verb "ensure", which is used for both clauses.
It would be more normal these days to use "is/are" with verbs like "ensure". The use of "be" is the subjunctive present form of "to be". It is formal. My writing style is quite formal and I would never use it. Modern American writers use the subjunctive more often than British writers but I am not sure if they would use it with "ensure".
2016년 4월 29일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!



