[삭제됨]
Why is the indicative mood rather than subjuctive mood? (detailed topic inside) Why did the conditional clause use subjunctive mood, while the main clause used indicative mood (i.e. past simple) rather than subjuctive mood (e.g. would do or be)? - If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods fell. If it were severe, they all fell.
2016년 10월 3일 오전 4:02
답변 · 6
1
I'm not sure there's much to explain here except that the writer made a mistake. The correct sentence would use your alternative: If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would fall. If it were severe, they would all fall. Another possibility would be a mixed conditional, which mixes a present condition with a hypothetical past result: If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would have fallen. If it were severe, they would all have fallen (actually, I'm not even sure what this sentence even means...I'm assuming “it" refers to wind, that's the only "it" word I can think of that collocates with "gentle" and “severe”.)
2016년 10월 3일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!