Danyel
Mike and his friends would go to see the races if it didn't rain... Mike and his friends would go to see the races if it didn't rain. & Mike and his friends would have gone to see the races if it hadn't rained. What is the difference?
2016년 11월 28일 오후 1:45
답변 · 2
1
For a start, the second sentence is a past conditional sentence. The first sentence is not correct. It should say "Mike and his friends will go to see the races if it doesn't rain." The second sentence describes something that would have happened if a certain condition had not been fulfilled. The revised version of the first sentence describes something that will happen (in the future) if a condition is not fulfilled. In a future conditional sentence you should not be using the word "would."
2016년 11월 28일
1
Hi Daniel, In the first sentence, we are talking about a potential/future event. If it doesn't rain, they will go to the races. If it rains, they won't. In the second sentence, we are talking about an event in the past. They didn't go to the races because it rained. They would have gone, if it hadn't rained. Best wishes, Jon
2016년 11월 28일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!