영어 강사 찾기
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе... Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. & Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn. What is the difference?
2017년 4월 29일 오전 9:35
답변 · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake! --- Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now! http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
2017년 4월 29일
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake. to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
2017년 4월 29일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!