영어 강사 찾기
Pedro Henrique
I ate kitchen, rice and pasta IN my lunch
Or
I ate kitchen, rice and pasta ON my lunch.
*Chicken
2017년 10월 5일 오후 9:52
답변 · 5
2
FOR lunch=)
2017년 10월 5일
1
"I ate chicken, rice and pasta FOR my lunch" would be grammatically correct.
However, it is far more common for native speakers to use the verb "to have" (instead of the verb "to eat") and it is also far more common to simply say "lunch" (instead of saying "my lunch").
Thus, your sentence would be: "I had chicken, rice and pasta for lunch".
More examples:
We usually ask "what are you HAVING for lunch?" (not "what are you EATING for YOUR lunch?")
We usually reply "I am HAVING chicken for lunch" (not "I am EATING chicken for MY lunch")
We usually ask "what did you HAVE for lunch?" (not "what did you EAT for YOUR lunch?")
We usually reply "I HAD chicken for lunch" (not "I ATE chicken for MY lunch").
Note: this same rule applies to other meals (breakfast, dinner, tea, supper).
We would ask "what did you HAVE for breakfast?" (not "what did you EAT for YOUR breakfast?")
We would say "I HAD sausages for dinner" (not "I ATE sausages for MY dinner")
etc
etc
2017년 10월 6일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
Pedro Henrique
언어 구사 능력
영어, 프랑스어, 포르투갈어, 스페인어
학습 언어
영어, 프랑스어, 스페인어
좋아할 수도 있는 읽을거리

The Power of Storytelling in Business Communication
38 좋아요 · 9 댓글

Back-to-School English: 15 Must-Know Phrases for the Classroom
25 좋아요 · 6 댓글

Ten Tourist towns in Portugal that nobody remembers
55 좋아요 · 22 댓글
다른 읽을거리