Search from various 영어 teachers...
[삭제됨]
Supposed to VS Suppose to Sorry again for this stupid grammar question... I don't wanna look up on internet today, I'm too lazy... ٩(๑`^´๑)۶ Are these two sentences grammatically correct? What am I suppose to tell you? What was I supposed to tell you? Please give me some examplezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
2018년 10월 25일 오전 11:14
답변 · 7
3
Hi Snoop, 'What am I suppose to tell you?' is incorrect The second is correct. Examples: What do you suppose Linus did when Snoopy washed his blanket? Snoopy: 'Linus' blanket was so dirty, what else was I supposed to do - use it on my sofa? Hope this helps :-) Martin
2018년 10월 25일
1
'suppose to' doesn't exist both sentences should be 'supposed to' - the tense is not important :)
2018년 10월 25일
1
The expression "supposed to", if you want to describe what someone should do, is always spelled "supposed to" and not "suppose to". It always goes with a form of the verb "to be" ("He was supposed to do ...............", or "She's not supposed to do ........").
2018년 10월 25일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!