Sunomonoius
While reading “The Prince” (grammar) “Machiavelli never hesitates to cite the actions of the duke for the benefit of usurpers who wish to keep the states they have seized” l’m not sure what the preposition “FOR” refers to. Does this sentence mean Machiavelli doesn’t hesitates to cite about Duke, in order for the usurpers’ benefits, or is it Duke whose action is for them? + I normally perceive what “for”s are for, by the sentences and situation and etc, but I don’t have the definite technique to determine firmly when under a situation that has potentially two subjects. If possible, would you also be able to teach me how you come to know the answer? ——————————————————————————— Excerpt From The Prince Niccolò Machiavelli https://books.apple.com/ca/book/the-prince/id395534069 This material may be protected by copyright.
2019년 10월 17일 오전 3:32
답변 · 3
1
I believe your first interpretation is probably correct, although I’ll admit that it is a bit ambiguous. It could be made clearer if the for-phrase were moved to the beginning of the sentence (and followed by a comma). The complete context should make it clear whether it’s Machiavelli or the Duke who is thinking about the usurpers.
2019년 10월 17일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!