Search from various 영어 teachers...
Muhamed Tešić
Do they interchangeable in some cases?
1: I saw him to play football
2: I saw him play football
3: I saw him playing football
Both express same meaning?
Both are grammatically correct?
Please explain their meanings
Someone says me simple past tense doesn't use gerund or infinitive
2020년 3월 21일 오전 10:43
답변 · 5
The first is incorrect, the preterite of 'to see' cannot be followed by the full infinitive in this way. It ca, however, be followed by either the bare infinitive or the present participle, so 2 and 3 are both correct and mean the same thing. The speaker is referring to a time in the past when they saw him playing football at the time they saw him
2020년 3월 21일
Hello,
My comments/suggestions are in brackets...
1: I saw him to play football [This is incorrect]
2: I saw him play football
3: I saw him playing football
Both express same meaning?
Both are grammatically correct? [2 and 3 are correct]
Please explain their meanings [2 and 3 both mean the speaker saw him at a time in the past while he was playing football]
Someone says me simple past tense doesn't use gerund or infinitive [that's true]
But it can be used in this way:
I told him to ask.
I asked him to go.
But notice here that the verbs that are in the past do not have "to" before them.
2020년 3월 21일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
Muhamed Tešić
언어 구사 능력
보스니아어, 영어
학습 언어
영어
좋아할 수도 있는 읽을거리

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
3 좋아요 · 0 댓글

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
2 좋아요 · 1 댓글

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 좋아요 · 17 댓글
다른 읽을거리
