Search from various 영어 teachers...
Ghazal
Hi . About passive
Hi
I came across this sentence " players pretend to have been fouled " .
I want to know why it is used " have been fouled " after to ?
I know it is passive but why past participle ?
I've learnd to + verb is infinitive
Why didn't writer said " players pretend to be fouled "
Is there any diferentce ?
Thank you
2020년 3월 28일 오전 8:47
답변 · 3
2
Jaren is right, it depends on what time period you are referring to.
We use the past participle in the passive
- (be + past participle)
For example, “First, Apples are chopped and placed in a bowl”. (Present passive).
“Computers have been used in offices for over twenty years” (Present Perfect Passive)
We use the passive when we don’t want to emphasise the person who did the action, or the person is not important.
Quentin Tarantino directed Pulp Fiction (ACTIVE)
Pulp Fiction was directed by Quentin Tarantino
(PASSIVE)
2020년 3월 28일
Thank Jaren for help
2020년 3월 28일
The difference between these sentences is very subtle.
If you were to say “players pretended to be fouled”, it means that they pretended at a specific point in the past, but now they are done pretending.
If you say “players pretend to have been fouled”, it means they are still pretending this past occurrence took place.
2020년 3월 28일
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
Ghazal
언어 구사 능력
영어, 프랑스어, 페르시아어
학습 언어
영어, 프랑스어
좋아할 수도 있는 읽을거리

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 좋아요 · 14 댓글

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 좋아요 · 12 댓글

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 좋아요 · 6 댓글
다른 읽을거리
