would be a shame don´t see you play.? or would be a shame won´t see you play.?
다양한 영어 선생님을 검색해 보세요...
답변 · 2
1
"It would be a shame not to see you play."
"Not to see you play" is a noun-clause here; it works as a thing. It answers the "what" in the question, "what would be a shame?"
You could also say, "it would be a shame if I didn't see you play". Here, you're using the Second Conditional pattern. This also means it's unlikely you'll miss your friend's playing: you do plan to see him/her play.
"It would be a shame that I won't see you play" is incorrect: you're talking about an imagined situation (would be) and a sure prediction (won't/will not) at the same time. This makes no sense. The best fix for this is to start with, "it will be a shame..." and make the missed appointment definite.
1
It would/will be a shame not to see you play.
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
집에서 편안하게 언어를 배울 수 있는 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 경험 많은 강사진을 살펴보고 지금 바로 첫 수업을 신청하세요!
오늘 학습 시작하기
