다양한 영어 선생님을 검색해 보세요...
Alex G
Hello everyone,
Could anybody explain why both "which" and "that" can be used as relative pronouns in defining relative clauses, whereas "that" cannot be used in non-defining relative clauses—even though both pronouns have the same meaning and serve the same function?
2026년 9월 11일 오전 7:38
답변 · 1
Grammatically “that” is used to single something out from a group so it sounds natural in defining relative clauses. It sounds less natural in non- defining relative clauses when non-essential information is introduced, however I would imagine there are a huge amount of native English speakers who get this wrong in everyday speech.
My advice is not to worry too much about formality or “why” and focus on learning a trick/ rule you can always remember.
For example: use “that” for essential information and “which” for extra information.
8시간 전
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
Alex G
언어 구사 능력
아랍어, 아랍어(이집트), 영어, 러시아어, 스페인어
학습 언어
좋아할 수도 있는 읽을거리

How to Work Effectively with International Teams
7 좋아요 · 2 댓글

Why Do People Still Ask You to Repeat Yourself?
19 좋아요 · 9 댓글

Why Your English Textbooks Didn’t Prepare You for Fast-Paced Meetings
16 좋아요 · 8 댓글
다른 읽을거리
