A very basic question that I should not ask but I ask anyway :)
Why we say "To be verbs" when it is actually "an infinitive". I think if it was a verb, then it mustn't have forms such as (am, is, are). This must actually be an infinitive with the base verb "be" and other forms based on different tenses.
I mean we should say "be" verb instead of "to be" verbs. Also, if "to be" was a verb, it's meaning should be similar based on each subject.
Take the example of "to walk". We say it's an infinitive with "walk" as a base verb. And the meaning of "walk" is intact based on the subjects. But, for "to be" it seems it is reverse.
다양한 영어 선생님을 검색해 보세요...
답변 · 4
0
I don't understand the question.
0
because you never use "to must", "to can", "to should" etc.
0
It is still a verb, it's just that this one is irregular, which happens to many verbs in English.
0
This is an interesting question.
I had not thought about this before.
"To be" does change forms more than other verbs.
"am / is / are" compared to "walk / walks" or "eat / eats."
I don't know why, but it is interesting to think about.
Good luck!
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
집에서 편안하게 언어를 배울 수 있는 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 경험 많은 강사진을 살펴보고 지금 바로 첫 수업을 신청하세요!
오늘 학습 시작하기
