Is there any difference in terms of MEANING between "to infinitive and the infinitive without to"?
For example : To have Vs have.
In this decotextualized comparison if some one asks you to tell the difference in meaning between these two. What would you say?
Do they have the same meaning? I think they must be similar and the only difference is their usage in sentences. Sometimes we should use one over the other with certain verbs.
다양한 영어 선생님을 검색해 보세요...
답변 · 6
1
I agree with you. They differ in terms of usage in the sentence. For instance, an infinitive without to follows modal verbs while some specific verbs must be followed by to infinitive.
e.g:
You can have some tea.
I'd like to have some coffee.
1
First off, the infinitive has no meaning aside from naming the action expressed by the verb. But it's unique in that it never refers to any specific person (=doesn't conjugate for person or tense), and can act like a noun: "To complain about the president would be considered treason in some countries."
The only difference is in syntax: some grammatical forms require *to*: "I want/need/try *to* help." Other forms don't take it at all, like modal verbs: "I can, will, should –[to] go." And with some forms, it's optional: "This book will help (to) teach you English."
0
By the way, the infinitive without *to* is called the plain infinitive.
아직도 답을 찾지 못하셨나요?
질문을 남겨보세요. 원어민이 도움을 줄 수 있을 거예요!
집에서 편안하게 언어를 배울 수 있는 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 경험 많은 강사진을 살펴보고 지금 바로 첫 수업을 신청하세요!
오늘 학습 시작하기
