Check out our updated Community
Wealthy and poor.

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

Aug 21, 2016 7:51 PM
Comments · 25

 If those wealthy nations had returned back all the things they robbed during the colonialism era, there wouldn't be such a huge gap between the wealthy and the poor. 

 And I don't think that some office clerks work harder than any asian rickshaw. Office clerks studied harder? No, they just went to schools that their parents were able to provide. So, the logic: who studies and works harder gets more simply does not work.

 The only form of sharing resourses between countries is war. But I think that providing education could really be the way to bring hope. But it must be really good education, not just English classes in some christian school to be able to talk to clients in the future.

August 22, 2016
Viruses travel on airplanes and mosquitoes fly across borders. If the wealthy nations want to be healthy, they'd better make sure that all nations are healthy. We all live on one planet, and the viruses and the mosquitos know it even if the politicians don't.
August 22, 2016
@K P internal problems and problems with neighbours a country may have are a really bad excuse for a rich country to go kill both the poor country's own people and often the neighbours too. And more often then you'd think, those very problems have been cooked up by the rich country as well.
August 22, 2016

@Katarina, ok, but the poorer nations must stop attaking and killing both neighbours and their own people too.

August 22, 2016
The rich nations should be required to stop attacking, invading, robbing and killing the poorer nations. It would be more than enough from them.
August 22, 2016
Show More
Language Skills
English, Kazakh, Russian, Turkish, Uzbek
Learning Language
English, Turkish