"To those who opened this war I want to say, that you have attacked one of the niciest personalities on this place. She never slammed anybody."
attacked Guyomar. If anybody attacked anybody, it was Guyomar who
attacked people who use ellipses more often than she deems
acceptable. Did you read the OP? She started a discussion calling people
"melodramatic," "immature" and "attention-seeking." Those who responded negatively were addressing the original post itself, not Guyomar.
Nobody would've had a problem with her discussion had it been worded
more respectfully and less judgmentally.
"I was astonished by the vehemence of the reactions towards Guyomar."People reacted to the nature of her original post yesterday, not Guyomar herself.
really am not trying to restart any arguments here; It's just that the
distinction between criticizing Guyomar and criticizing the tone of her
thread is an important one.
As the brilliant contributor Jerry might say: "It's getting boring 'on here.'
Okay, he wasn't brilliant, but he tried.